This past week was dominated with election news, as voters
exercised their democratic rights. Let’s look at the big electoral winners of
the week.
Kamla strikes back
She may have lost five straight elections, been mired in one
controversy after another and could possibly have a charge for possession
hanging over her, but Kamla Persad-Bissessar has shown that just like Charlie
Sheen, she too still has legions of adoring fans who believe in her no matter
what she does. Last Saturday Mrs.
Persad-Bissessar crushed her rivals to win reelection as leader of the UNC. Of course this being a UNC election it was not
without accusations of fraud and at least one threat of court action.
Mr. Roodal Moonial who ran against Mrs. Persad- Bissessar
made accusations of vote rigging saying ballots indicating votes for him were
found on the riverbank near the Pravati Girls Hindu College in Debe; presumably
amongst One Direction and Justin Bieber posters.
The other contender Mr. Vasant Bharath voiced concerns regarding
the electoral ink, saying it washed off so easily, they might as well have used
fake sticker tattoos found in packets of chewing gum to mark voters.
Mrs. Persad-Bissessar maintains that the election was free
and fair and that she is willing to work with Mr. Moonilal and Mr. Bharath, and
by work with them, she means think of them fondly anytime she glances at the backbenches
in Parliament or hears the word ‘Judas’. Some cynics have argued that the PNM
loves the fact that Mrs. Persad-Bissessar won reelection, considering that they
have defeated her 6 times already if you count the recent Arima and Tunapuna
bye-elections.
Even so you have to admire Mrs. Persad-Bissessar, like the
West Indies Cricket team, no matter how many humiliating defeats she suffers;
she always manages to convince her supporters that the return to glory is just
a game or court ruling away.
Viva La Toilet Paper!
The UNC weren’t the only ones having an election over the weekend.
Last Sunday, our neighbours in the socialist paradise of Venezuela sent a
resounding message across the world that they really like being able to use
toilet paper. I am speaking of course of the Venezuelan Congressional
elections, where for the first time in over a decade, Venezuela’s opposition
parties, The Democratic Unity Coalition overwhelmingly defeated the ruling
United Socialist Party of Venezuela. (PSUV)
PSUV is the party headed by President Nicolas Maduro and was founded
by the late Hugo Chavez; the Charismatic psychopath who enthralled crackpots at
UWI, trade unionists and bogus hunger strikers in T&T with his so-called socialist
Bolivarian revolution. Supporters of the Bolivarian revolution claim it has
eliminated economic inequality, class privilege and imperialism.
Most Venezuelans though feel all it has really done is eliminate
food, democracy and toilet paper. Forget the socialist slogan “power to the
people”, the only power Venezuela’s want now is the power to wipe their butts
again.
Naturally President Maduro was disappointed with the election
results. After all he devoted a lot of time to campaigning, spreading the
message of socialism as well as jailing his opposition rivals. Opposition politician, Luis Diaz was even
shot dead days before the election, and if that couldn’t convince swing voters
of the glory of the revolution then perhaps nothing would.
In light of his loss in congress, President Maduro has vowed
to “radicalize “the Bolivarian revolution in time for the next general
election. It will be a tough task considering that Venezuela already has sky
high crime, the highest inflation in the world and a worthless currency. But
one should never underestimate the ability of socialism to be even more
“radical”.
War and Peace
The most controversial
vote of the past two weeks though wasn’t an election but a Parliamentary vote
in the British House of Commons. By a
margin of 524 to 42 British MPs voted in favor of launching airstrikes on ISIS
controlled areas in Syria. Critics of
the vote argued that such airstrikes could potentially harm civilians.
Those in
favor countered by asking to which Syrian civilians were critics referring
too-the ones currently being burnt alive, thrown off buildings or decapitated
by ISIS lunatics? To which, said critics responded by muttering “ok point taken”.
Of course that didn’t satisfy hippies, conspiracy theorists and apologists for
terrorism.
Writing in his Sunday column, UWI lecturer Dylan Kerrigan
suggested it was wrong for British MPs to blame “the individual” for becoming
a terrorist. After all just because someone jumps on a plane, travels to
Turkey, sneaks into Syria and joins a notorious terrorist group, doesn’t mean
they are responsible for their actions. Capitalism, racism and the illuminati
all made them do it.
So congratulations to the winners of the past week and to the
losers, I leave you with the wise words of Winston Churchill; “democracy is the
worst form of government-except for all the others”.
3 comments:
Just to point out an error with your statistics which also misguides your argument on the decision by the UK House of Commons in support of bombing Syria - the vote was actually 397 votes for the bombing, and 223 votes against, and not the ludicrous margin of 524 to 4 as you suggest. Are you also suggesting that anyone who was against the bombing is a terrorist sympathiser, or are you making fun of Cameron's highly criticized rhetoric bearing those same words?
CORRECTION:
Anonymous is correct, The stat quoted is the vote in favour of strikes on ISIS in Iraq not Syria. The Syria vote was indeed 397-223 in favour.
Will leave article as is.
In my column the argument i was trying to make was that individuals are the products of culture and society. They are not simply timeless persons born that way. People as social beings are made (produced), they are not simply born. They are enculturated, then socialised, both under particular environmental conditions (social, economic and cultural pressures). Sociology for the whole of the last 150 years has been making the same argument. Did you miss that?
My problem is society - specifically elites and the masses - both like simple explanations rather than accurate ones. Newspapers pander to such simplicity all the time. These simplifications are then used as smokescreens to distract from avenues to social change. We are misdirected by culture industries. happens with the education system too. Religion as well. The list of such industries is a long one.
I see in your bio you make claims to being a "freelance writer". I hope that goes well for you. Calling fellow writers "morons", and failing to engage with ideas you don't understand or like in courteous ways is probably not the smartest approach to making your way in that field.
I'm more than happy to debate someone that doesn't agree with me, but you didn't seem to want to do that and instead called me names. That was brilliant of you. I was really impressed.
Tell me why i'm wrong. Write something about it. People make knowledge in conversation with each other, not in their silos. Tell me my writing wasn't clear this week. Tell me psychology takes a different vista to what i'm suggesting. Show me why the individual is always to blame and context is not important. Show me why your way of thinking is worth considering and perhaps even changing my position. That is what good writers do. Teach me if you can. I'm willing to learn.
So why not write an argument/post back to me? no one likes a person that is rude and doesn't want to debate. It just makes me think poorly of you and i don't even know you.
Good luck with the freelance writing.
Dylan
Post a Comment